Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Baseline clinical characteristics, values expressed as n (%).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Body composition and function, values given as median (IQR), unless state otherwise.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Appendicular muscle mass in each subset was shown with a p-value of Wilcoxon rank-sum test.

The median was presented as the black line. The top and bottom of each box indicated the upper and lower quartiles of the samples and the bars represented the minimum and maximum values. M, metastasis; PD, progressive disease.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 3.

Simple and multiple linear regression analysis using appendicular muscle mass as the dependent variable.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Association between appendicular muscle mass and hemoglobin level (a) and handgrip strength (b).

The grey area indicates the 95% confidence interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Patients with appendicular muscle mass of ≥ 19.0 kg (quartile four, highest amount of muscle mass) had a significantly longer overall survival compared with those with low appendicular muscle (quartiles one to three); HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.95, p = 0.037.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models for overall survival.

More »

Table 4 Expand