Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Screenshot of a virtual patient scenario (left side) and the concept mapping tool (right side).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics and descriptions for variables used in the study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Overview of the study design.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Average number of elements—added nodes in each category and number of added connections—for the three groups and the expert maps.

*significant difference between group C (correct diagnosis was made on first attempt) and S (correct diagnosis provided by the system) (p<0.05), ** significant difference between group S and groups C and W (correct final diagnosis was submitted after first attempt).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Average scores, confidence with final diagnosis, time on task, and feedback requests by groups of concept maps—Group C (correct diagnosis was made on first attempt), group W (correct final diagnosis was submitted after first attempt) and group S (correct diagnosis provided by the system).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Correlations between variables in the three groups Group C (correct diagnosis was made on first attempt), group W (correct final diagnosis was submitted after first attempt) and group S (correct final diagnosis provided by the system).

More »

Fig 4 Expand