Fig 1.
Conceptual framework of the study.
Table 1.
Demographic profile.
Table 2.
Quasi-experimental research design.
Table 3.
Marking scheme for representation test and mathematical problem solving.
Table 4.
UNIANOVA: Difference in mathematical belief gain score of treatment and control groups.
Table 5.
Means, standard errors and 95% confidence interval in mathematical belief gain scores of treatment and control groups.
Fig 2.
Mathematical belief means for the treatment and control groups.
Table 6.
UNIANCOVA: Differences in mathematical representation gain scores of treatment and control groups.
Fig 3.
Mathematical representation means for the treatment and control groups.
Table 7.
UNIANCOVA: Differences in mathematical problem solving gain scores between treatment and control groups.
Fig 4.
Mathematical problem-solving means for the treatment and control groups.
Fig 5.
Role of mathematical representation as a mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving for the treatment group.
Table 8.
Bootstrapping: Role of mathematical representation as a mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving in the treatment group.
Fig 6.
Role of mathematical representation as a mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving for the control group.
Table 9.
Bootstrapping test: Role of mathematical representation as a mediator between mathematical belief and problem solving in the control group.