Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow diagram for patient’s selection.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics of the patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Outcomes of model development using different modified values of variables.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Regression coefficients and hazard ratios for variables in the risk prediction model at CKD stage 3 patients.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Regression coefficients and hazard ratios for variables in the risk prediction model at CKD stage 4 patients.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Regression coefficients and hazard ratios for variables in the risk prediction model at CKD stage 5 patients.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Predicted probability of starting renal replacement therapy.

A) Patient with RRT after 5 years of follow-up (age = 56 years, sex = female, DM = no, PKD = yes, albumin = 4.06g/dla, hemoglobin = 8.01g/dla, calcium = 8.31mg/dla, phosphorus = 3.16mg/dla, potassium = 4.95mmol/La, eGFR = 18.36, protein = 2+). B) Patient without RRT censored after 5 years of follow-up (age = 58 years, sex = male, DM = yes, PKD = no, albumin = 4.65g/dla, hemoglobin = 12.11g/dla, calcium = 9.70mg/dla, phosphorus = 3.10mg/dla, potassium = 4.02mmol/La, eGFR = 54.81, protein = negative). (aintegral mean value) Side lines are 95% confidence interval (CI).

More »

Fig 2 Expand