Fig 1.
Unadjusted (A), detrended (B), and detrended & debarked (C) Resistograph profiles.
Fig 2.
SilviScan mean ring density plotted against cambial age.
Table 1.
List of variables and descriptive statistics–minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV) and individual narrow-sense heritabilities () with standard errors in parentheses.
Fig 3.
Relationship between SilviScan area-weighted mean density (DEN) and (A) unadjusted Resistograph mean density (RESA and RESB on the left, RES on the right) and (B) adjusted Resistograph mean density (RESTB_A and RESTB_B on the left, RESTB on the right).
Fig 4.
Relationship between SilviScan area-weighted mean density (DEN) and inverse value of Pilodyn penetration depth with bark (left) and without bark (right).
Table 2.
Genetic and phenotypic correlations of SilviScan area-weighted mean density (DEN) with different Resistograph and Pilodyn wood density estimates (standard errors in parentheses).
Fig 5.
Relationships of stem volume (VOL) with SilviScan (DEN), Resistograph (RESTB) and Pilodyn (PIL) wood density.
Fig 6.
Dendrogram of genetic relationships among growth and wood quality traits.
Table 3.
Genetic and phenotypic correlations of indirect wood density estimates (SilviScan, Resistograph and Pilodyn) with growth, fiber and other wood quality traits (standard errors in parentheses).
Table 4.
Genetic gain (in parentheses) and correlated genetic response (both in %) for selected traits with selection intensity of 1%.