Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart: Mechanics of agent entry.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Change in Disallowed-Realised ratio with βmove.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Flowchart: Mechanics of agent movement.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Model Parameters.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Emergence of ‘dual’ segregations.

Blue: Average Fraction of Rich Neighbours (FR) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Green: Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Sensitivity to system size and population.

Blue: Average Fraction of Rich Neighbours (FR) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Green: Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Left: M = 25 and initial population = 1,250. Right: Sensitivity to System Size: M = 100 and initial population = 5,000. Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Sensitivity to correlation between agent wealth and agent ethnicity.

Blue: Average Fraction of Rich Neighbours (FR) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Green: Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Left: Wealth and ethnicity uncorrelated. Right: Wealth and ethnicity completely correlated. Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of results with Benard and Willer.

Blue: Average Fraction of Rich Neighbours (FR) v. Correlation between wealth and ethnicity. Green: Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) v. Correlation between wealth and ethnicity. Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Sensitivity to shape of wealth distribution, migrant entry rate (rmig), and difficulty of migrant entry into city (βin).

Blue: Average Fraction of Rich Neighbours (FR) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Green: Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Left: e0 agents: LN(0.75, 0.25) and e1 agents: LN(0, 0.25). Centre: rmig = 0.025 for 100 out of 500 iterations. Right: βin = 10. Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Sensitivity to willingness of agents to move into less wealthier neighbourhoods (βchoice).

Blue: Average Fraction of Rich Neighbours (FR) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Green: Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Left: βchoice = 2. Right: βchoice = ∞. Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Sensitivity to agent tolerance level (τ).

Average Size of e0 Neighbourhoods (S0) vs. Tolerance Level (τ). Error bars represent 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Comparison of results with Gargiulo, Gandica and Carletti.

Left: Cell Segregation Indicator (CSI) v. Disallowed-Realised Ratio. Right: Average Population distribution across all M = 50 cells for different values of βmove (Fraction of total population in each cell). Black Dashed Line: Fully homogeneous distribution. Blue: βmove = 1000. Green: βmove = 100. Red: βmove = 10. Cyan: βmove = 5.

More »

Fig 11 Expand