Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The experimental setup, in which the seated participant wore a virtual reality HMD.

The experimenter’s monitor replicated the participant’s view of the virtual scene.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

A block of four trials.

The solid line represents the displacement of the left forearm through flexion-extension of the left arm by the motorised manipulandum.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

The virtual reality setup.

The upper panels show the participant’s view (i.e. a first-person perspective) when the avatar’s forearms were visible (A) or masked (B). The lower panels show a third-person perspective of the virtual environment when the avatar’s forearms were visible (C) or masked (D).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

The mean ± SD occurrence, speed and duration of the kinaesthetic illusion under each of the experimental conditions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

The mean speed of the illusion, as a function of the sensory condition (bimodal, vision, and proprioception) and the movement direction condition (extension and flexion).

* p <0.05, *** p<0.001. The error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The mean duration of the illusion, expressed in percentage, as a function of the sensory condition (bimodal, vision, and proprioception) and the movement direction condition (extension and flexion).

*** p<0.001, NS: non significant. The error bars correspond to the standard error of the mean.

More »

Fig 5 Expand