Fig 1.
Flow chart of literature search and study selection.
Table 1.
Characteristics of the patients in the included studies.
Fig 2.
Forest plots of good outcomes.
A: Forest plots showing the odds ratios of good outcomes (90-day mRS of 0–2) in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) vs. those treated with best medical treatment (BMT). B: Forest plots showing the odds ratios of good outcomes (90-day mRS of 0–2) in patients treated with MT vs. those treated with BMT excluding the study by Urra X et al.
Fig 3.
Forest plots of excellent outcomes.
Forest plots showing the odds ratios of excellent outcomes (90-day mRS of 0–1) in the patients treated with MT vs. those treated with BMT.
Fig 4.
Forest plots showing the odds ratios of mortality in the patients treated with MT vs. those treated with BMT.
Fig 5.
Forest plots of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.
A: Forest plots showing the odds ratios of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage in the patients treated with MT vs. those treated with BMT. B: Forest plots showing the odds ratios of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage between the patients treated with MT and those treated with BMT excluding the study by Urra X et al.