Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Eligibility screening.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

CONSORT 2010 Flow Diagram.

MC, Maintenance Care.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Baseline data for control and MC groups, n = 324.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Follow up data at 52 weeks.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Difference between groups in total number of days with bothersome LBP and visits during study period (Control-MC).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Mean number of days with bothersome LBP per week, observed data.

LBP, Non-specific Low Back Pain; MC, Maintenance Care; 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Mean difference in number of days with bothersome LBP per week, primary analysis.

Variables in GEE model: Group, Time, Time2, Group*Time, Group*Time2; the difference is statistically significant (at 5% level) between week 24 to 37; LBP, Non-specific Low Back Pain; MC, Maintenance Care; C, Control; 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Mean difference in number of days with bothersome LBP per week, secondary analysis.

Variables in GEE model: Group, Time, Time2, Group*Time, Group*Time2, Number of days with pain week 1 of study period, Clinician, Pain intensity at baseline, Use of analgesic medication during inclusion period; the difference is statistically significant (at 5% level) between week 13 to 43; LBP, Non-specific Low Back Pain; MC, Maintenance Care; C, Control; 95% CI, 95% Confidence Interval.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 5.

Other specific treatment side effects, reported qualitatively.

More »

Table 5 Expand