Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Network of the Quebec national parks included in the ecological monitoring program and parks selected for this study: (A) Jacques-Cartier, (B) Bic, and (C) Frontenac.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematization of the analysis grid for the ecological validation of indicators.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Sampling characteristics of the Frontenac National Park indicators selected for statistic validation.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Detailed analysis grid of the ecological validation of indicators for the freshwater ecosystem of Frontenac National Park.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Statistical power (%) for the Frontenac National Park indicators over two monitoring period (10 and 20 years), for two change rates to detect (2% and 5%) and two levels of significance (0,10 and 0,20).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Distribution of indicators measured at the Frontenac National Park according to their statistical power calculated for different monitoring periods, change rates to detect, and levels of significance.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Summary analysis grid of the BIOPSIE for the Frontenac National Park.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Summary analysis grid of the BIOPSIE for the Jacques-Cartier national park.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Summary analysis grid of the BIOPSIE for the Bic National Park.

More »

Fig 6 Expand