Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Patient characteristics.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Result of postablation I-131 whole-body scintigraphy and postablation SPECT/CT in the low-or intermediate-risk group.

SPECT/CT: single-photon emission computed tomography; RAI: radioactive iodine; mLN: metastatic lymph node; RxWBS: postablation I-131 whole-body planar scintigraphy.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Postablation I-131 whole body planar scan and SPECT/CT of a patient with papillary thyroid cancer.

Preablation TSH-stimulated serum thyroglobulin level was 4.7 ng/ml. A focal iodine uptake was seen in the right neck on postablation I-131 planar scintigraphy (a). The SPECT/CT image also revealed RAI uptake on a small LN in the right upper neck (b).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for preablation TSH-stimulated serum thyroglobulin level of RAI avid metastatic lymph node on SPECT/CT in low- or intermediate-risk group.

The optimal cut-off value of TSH-stimulated serum Tg was 0.5 ng/ml for predicting residual RAI avid mLN (sensitivity, 68.6%; specificity, 61.1%; area under the curve, 0.615; p = 0.022).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Comparison of clinicopathological parameters between patients with and without RAI-avid mLN.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Prevalence of RAI-avid mLN according to risk group and preablation TSH-stimulated serum Tg level.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Receiver-operating-characteristics (ROC) curve analysis for preablation TSH-stimulated serum thyroglobulin level of RAI avid metastatic lymph node on SPECT/CT in low-risk group.

The optimal cut-off of TSH-stimulated serum Tg level for predicting RAI-avid mLN in the low-risk group was 1.0 ng/ml (sensitivity, 100.0%; specificity, 71.9%; area under the curve, 0.798; p = 0.039).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of clinicopathological parameters between patients with and without RAI-avid mLN in the low-risk group.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of clinicopathological parameters between patients with and without RAI-avid mLN in the intermediate-risk group.

More »

Table 5 Expand