Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Schema showing the time points MRI and CT images were acquired relative to when SABR treatment was given (Day 0).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Patient details.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Percentage change in tumour volume between the 6 month, 12 month, 24 month and last follow-up CT relative to baseline CT.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Baseline ADC map with tumour contour in red for patient 3 and associated histogram showing the frequency of ADC values in each MRI scan.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Correlation coefficients between the change in ADC measures relative to baseline MRI and the change in tumour volume from CT.

P-values ≤ 0.05 are in bold.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Selected DCE maps at baseline and follow-up MRI scan 2 for patient 3, left to right: The contrast enhancement GD map (green = plateau, red = washout, blue = persistent), IRE, Tonset, Twashout and Ktrans.

The corresponding image between MRI scans has been visually selected.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Correlation coefficients between the change in mean DCE semi-quantitative parametric and pharmacokinetic values relative to baseline MRI and the change in tumour volume from CT.

P-values ≤ 0.05 are in bold.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Scatterplots showing the change in (a) percentage washout voxels, (b) mean IRE and (c) mean Ktrans from follow-up MRI scan 2 versus (left–right) percentage tumour volume change at the 12 month and last follow-up CT.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The percentage tumour voxels with each of the four characteristic contrast enhancement curve patterns.

B = baseline, F1 = follow-up MRI scan 1, F2 = follow-up MRI scan 2.

More »

Fig 6 Expand