Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Japan Coma Scale.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Flowchart of patients enrolled in the study.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Patient’s characteristics and outcomes.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Summary statistics of accuracy for predicting mortality.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 2.

Receiver operating characteristic curves for mortality.

(A) qSOFA score vs. each parameter in all patients, noninfected patients, and infected patients; (B) qSOFA score vs. MEWS in the three groups. AUC, the area under the curve; BT, body temperature; HR, heart rate; MEWS, Modified Early Warning Score; qSOFA, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; RR, respiratory rate; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Multivariate receiver operating characteristic curve analysis for mortality in all patients, noninfected patients, and infected patients.

The qSOFA+ model was based on the risk factors of age, sex, and qSOFA score. The qSOFA- model was based on age and sex only. AUC, the area under the curve; qSOFA, quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

Likelihood ratio test comparing models for predicting mortality.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Multivariate regression analysis for mortality.

More »

Table 5 Expand