Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

List of tables provided as input into the VML, subject to minimum stated counts.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Proportion of forenames in different ethnic groups estimated from cluster analysis of names in the 2011 Census (left) and from predictions by Onomap (right).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Proportion of surnames in different ethnic groups estimated from cluster analysis of names in the 2011 Census (left) and from predictions by Onomap (right).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Frequencies of aggregate categories of self-assigned ethnicity in 2011 Census (England and Wales) rounded to the nearest 100 from calculations made using VML.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Unweighted prediction accuracy for different age bands.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Prediction accuracy for women (solid line) and men (dashed line) by age in each self-ascribed ethnic category (the small Arab/Mixed/Other category is not shown).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Prediction accuracy for women (black bar) and men (grey bar) by marital status in each self-ascribed ethnic category (the small Arab/Mixed/Other category is not shown).

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Prediction accuracy according to region of residence (North East NE; North West NW; East Midlands EM; West Midlands WM; Yorkshire and Humber YH; East England EE; Greater London GL; South East SE; South West SW; Wales WA).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Prediction accuracy for women (black bar) and men (grey bar) by region in each ethnic group (codes for regions as in Fig 6).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 3.

First set of follow-up algorithms and their main characteristics.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

The Census-based surname lookup table for Ethnicity Estimator.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Example of assigning ethnic class using Ethnicity Estimator.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Aggregate prediction accuracy of all algorithms for each ethnic group.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 8.

Prediction accuracy of OM-GA for women (solid line) and men (dashed line) by age in each ethnic group.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Table 7.

Instances of incompleteness of forename and surname pairs, and types of inconsistency between forenames and surnames.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 9.

Prediction accuracy of EE-A by format of names in each ethnic group.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Table 8.

Re-weighted modifications of algorithms to mitigate the dominance of the ‘White British’ category for EE-A and EE-RS.

More »

Table 8 Expand

Table 9.

Aggregate prediction accuracy of re-weighted algorithms for each ethnic group.

More »

Table 9 Expand