Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Example stimuli and experimental conditions.

Example sentences and a comprehension question in each of the three critical conditions and the two filler conditions.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Boxplot of nonliteral response rates in the three conditions in Experiment 1.

Horizontal lines in each box depict the median; black circles depict the mean. Boxes extend to first and third quartiles; whiskers extend to 1.5 x interquartile range.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Histogram of nonliteral response rates.

Histogram displaying participants’ mean nonliteral response rate in irony condition only.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Grand mean ERPs for the nonliteral group (n = 10) at 26 representative electrode sites.

The vertical calibration bar indicates the temporal onset of the emoji stimulus and extends to indicate ±2.5 μV of brain activity with negative voltage plotted up; 200 ms of prestimulus and 1000 ms of poststimulus brain activity are depicted.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Topographic plots depicting ERP effects from the irony minus match condition difference waves.

The three time windows correspond to the P200 component (left), the P600 component (center), and late frontal positivity (right). Color scale (± 2μV) is held constant across scalp maps.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Grand mean ERPs for the literal group (n = 25) at 26 representative electrode sites.

The vertical calibration bar indicates the temporal onset of the emoji stimulus and extends to indicate 2.5 μV of brain activity with negative voltage plotted up; 200 ms of prestimulus and 1000 ms of poststimulus brain activity are depicted.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Topographic plots depicting ERP effects from the irony minus match condition difference waves.

The three time windows correspond to the P200 component (left), the P600 component (center), and late frontal positivity (right). Color scale (± 2μV) is held constant across scalp maps.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Boxplot of nonliteral response rates in the three conditions in Experiment 2.

Horizontal lines in each box depict the median; black circles depict the mean. Boxes extend to first and third quartiles; whiskers extend to 1.5 x interquartile range.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Grand mean ERPs in Experiment 2 (n = 35) at 26 representative electrode sites.

The vertical calibration bar indicates the temporal onset of the emoji stimulus and extends to indicate 2.5 μV of brain activity with negative voltage plotted up; 200 ms of prestimulus and 1000 ms of poststimulus brain activity are depicted.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Topographic plots depicting ERP effects from the irony minus match condition difference waves.

The three time windows correspond to the P200 component (left), the P600 component (center), and late frontal positivity (right). Color scale (± 2μV) is held constant across scalp maps.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Boxplot of nonliteral response rates in the three conditions in Experiment 3.

Horizontal lines in each box depict the median; black circles depict the mean. Boxes extend to first and third quartiles; whiskers extend to 1.5 x interquartile range.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Grand mean ERPs in Experiment 3 (n = 36) at 26 representative electrode sites.

The vertical calibration bar indicates the temporal onset of the emoji stimulus and extends to indicate 2.5 μV of brain activity with negative voltage plotted up; 200 ms of prestimulus and 1000 ms of poststimulus brain activity are depicted.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

Topographic plots depicting ERP effects from the irony minus match condition difference waves.

The three time windows correspond to the P200 component (left), the P600 component (center), and late frontal positivity (right). Color scale (± 2μV) is held constant across scalp maps.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Correlations of behavioral responses with ERP components across all three experiments.

a–P200 effect, irony condition; b–P600 effect, irony condition; c–LFP, irony condition; d–LFP, mismatch condition.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 1.

Summary of statistically significant effects across experiments.

More »

Table 1 Expand