Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Subject characteristic.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Volume of interests—Volume information.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Time activity curves in various ROIs.

(A) Mean tissue time-activity curves expressed as standardized uptake values (SUV) for 20 scans in 10 subjects. (B) Mean tissue time-activity curves of various volumes within the thalamus, expressed as standardized uptake values (SUV) for 20 scans in 10 subjects. (C) Mean tissue time-activity curves of various volumes of white matter expressed as standardized uptake values (SUV, 20 scans in 10 subjects).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Image-derived input function characteristics.

(A) Time activity curves of the image-derived input function with test-retest studies were shown. There was no significant difference (p = 0.001). (B) It was shown area under the curves of IDIF with test-retest studies and was not shown any significant difference.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

The ratio of area under the curves.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

Distribution volume differences with test-retest studies (n = 10).

Illustrate correlation of values of LGM_VT between test and retest.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 4.

VT and BPND values for all VOIs.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 4.

Reference tissue curve characteristics.

(A) Mean TAC curves for the reference curves between test-retest studies (n = 6). (B) Mean AUC of the reference curves between test and retest.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Test-retest variability of chronic lesions in MS patients (n = 53).

(A) Graph of the test-retest variability of the VT versus BPND measures of PK in chronic MS lesions. (B) It shows the percent variability of the LGM-VT measures of PK in 53 chronic MS lesions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand