Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flowchart of the R-ABC algorithm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

An example of the reinforcement vector update.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

An example of changing 10D reinforcement.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Possible update ranges of food sources.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Numerical benchmark functions.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

CEC2005’s shifted functions.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

CEC2014’s hybrid functions.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Values of control parameters.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Values of adaptivity coefficients and crossover rates used in aABC algorithm.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Results for basic benchmark functions (MFE = 30000).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Rankings of the algorithms by the Friedman’s test on the basic benchmark functions.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Results for basic benchmark functions (MCN = 10000).

More »

Table 8 Expand

Fig 5.

Convergence performance on the Sphere function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Convergence performance on the Sum Squares function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Convergence performance on the Dixon-Price function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Convergence performance on the Rosenbrock function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Convergence performance on the Rastrigin function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Convergence performance on the Schwefel function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 10 Expand

Fig 11.

Convergence performance on the Ackley function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 11 Expand

Fig 12.

Convergence performance on the Griewank function with different dimensions.

More »

Fig 12 Expand

Fig 13.

The final results of the CEC2005’s shifted functions for all tested dimensions.

More »

Fig 13 Expand

Fig 14.

Rankings of the algorithms by the Friedman’s test on the CEC2005’s shifted functions.

More »

Fig 14 Expand

Table 9.

Results for CEC2005’s shifted functions (MFE = 30000).

More »

Table 9 Expand

Table 10.

The result of Wilcoxon’s test of the algorithm on the CEC2005’s shifted functions.

More »

Table 10 Expand

Fig 15.

Convergence performance on the CEC2014’s hybrid functions with D = 100.

More »

Fig 15 Expand

Table 11.

Results for CEC2014’s hybrid functions (MFE = 30000).

More »

Table 11 Expand

Table 12.

The result of Wilcoxon’s test of the algorithm on the CEC2014’s hybrid functions.

More »

Table 12 Expand

Fig 16.

The final results of the CEC2005’s shifted functions with different values of γ and κ.

More »

Fig 16 Expand

Table 13.

Rankings by the Friedman’s test on the CEC2005’s shifted functions with different κ.

More »

Table 13 Expand