Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow-diagram of study selection and inclusion in the systematic review and meta-analyses as per PRISMA guidelines.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analyses.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Summary of clinical outcomes of studies included in the systematic review and meta-analyses.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Forest plot (including the risk of bias assessment) demonstrating significant reduction in the risk of acute grade 2 or worse xerostomia with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared to conventional techniques.

Note comparable benefit of IMRT over two-dimensional radiotherapy (2D-RT) and three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-RT) on subgroup analyses.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Forest plot (including the risk of bias assessment) demonstrating significant reduction in the risk of late grade 2 or worse xerostomia with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared to two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy (2D/3D-RT).

Note the consistent and persistent benefit of IMRT over time on subgroup analyses.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Forest plot (including the risk of bias assessment) demonstrating non-significant reduction in the risk of loco-regional relapse with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared to two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy (2D/3D-RT).

On subgroup analyses, patients with nasopharyngeal cancers demonstrate significantly improved loco-regional control (LRC) with IMRT compared to conventional techniques, while there is no significant difference in LRC between IMRT and 2D/3D-RT for patients with cancers of the laryngo-pharynx.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Forest plot (including the risk of bias assessment) demonstrating significant reduction in the risk of death with intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) compared to two-dimensional/three-dimensional radiotherapy (2D/3D-RT).

On subgroup analyses, patients with nasopharyngeal cancers demonstrate significantly improved overall survival (OS) with IMRT compared to conventional techniques, while there is no significant difference in OS between IMRT and 2D/3D-RT for patients with cancers of the laryngo-pharynx.

More »

Fig 5 Expand