Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Design of selected risk scores.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Variables included in each risk score.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Models and corresponding tuning parameters.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

A. Distribution of the sampling variables. Age: age at surgery; eject_fracti: ejection fraction; atrium_size: left atrial size; hypertensio: pulmonary hypertension; reoperation: number of previous cardiac surgeries; emergency: emergency surgery; cardiac_sh: cardiogenic shock; aortic valve: aortic valve surgery B. Distribution of sampling variables. Valve_revasc: heart valve surgery and CABG; tricuspid: tricuspid valve surgery; pacemaker: pacemaker dependency; ami48h: acute myocardial infarction 48h after cardiac surgery; dialysis: renal replacement therapy after cardiac surgery; renal_failure: acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery; high_creatinine: creatinine levels higher than 2mg/dl.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Characteristics of sample.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

MINE results.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Receiver operating curves compared across models.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 6.

Performance for all 13 models.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 3.

Variable importance grid for the top models.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 7.

Area under the curve for the RheSCORE, 2000 Bernstein-Parsonnet, EuroSCORE II, InsCor, Ambler score, Guaragna score and the New York score.

More »

Table 7 Expand