Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Overview of the experimental paradigm.

Three experimental tasks and one control task were featured. One cycle of blocks is illustrated. Six such cycles were administered.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Overview of behavioral results.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Activation maps of the Arabic digit comparison task.

The task was contrasted with the control condition (p < 0.01 FWE).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Clusters identified in the Arabic > control contrast (FWE-corrected p < 0.01).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

VNFA cluster activity and response magnitudes.

(A) Slices illustrate VNFA cluster activity at z = -17 across conditions (p < 0.05 FWE). (B) Average parameter estimates for this cluster across conditions.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Activation maps of the verbal number comparison task.

The task was contrasted with the control condition (p < 0.01 FWE).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Clusters identified in the verbal > control contrast (FWE-corrected p < 0.01).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

MTG cluster activity and response magnitudes.

(A) Slices illustrate MTG cluster activity at z = 20 across conditions (p < 0.05 FWE). (B) Average parameter estimates for this cluster across conditions.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Activation maps of the nonsymbolic magnitude comparison task.

The task was contrasted with the control condition (p < 0.01 FWE).

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Table 4.

Clusters identified in the nonsymbolic > control contrast (FWE-corrected p < 0.01).

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 7.

Activation maps of each parametric task contrast.

All contrasts were thresholded at p < 0.001 uncorrected. Slices range from z = 35 to z = 41. (A) Arabic digit comparison task. (B) Verbal number comparison task. (C) Nonsymbolic magnitude comparison task.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Table 5.

Clusters identified in the parametric [Close > Distant] contrasts (uncorrected p < 0.001).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Overlapping clusters identified in the conjunction task–control analysis (FWE-corrected p < 0.05).

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Overlapping clusters identified in the conjunction [Close > Distant] analysis (FWE-corrected p < 0.05).

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Overlapping activations across all tasks.

(A) Conjunction analysis of all task–control contrasts (p < 0.05 FWE). (B) Conjunction analysis of parametric contrasts across all three tasks (p < 0.05 FWE).

More »

Fig 8 Expand