Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Acoustic pulse.

A typical acoustic pulse in the treated area.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic action of the acoustic pulse.

A scheme of the new technological device for cow treatments producing high powered acoustic pulses distributed on a large treatment area with deep penetration via the applicator.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Distribution of 116 cows from 3 dairy herds according to treatment group, herd and bacteria specie.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Daily milk yield.

Daily milk yield of 116 cows from 3 commercial herds identified with subclinical mastitis, before treatment and up to 3 months after it according to APT treatment (n = 78) and control (n = 38).

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Log somatic cell count (logSCC) and milk yield on the cow level and % lactose on the quarter level, before treatment and up to 3 months according to result—Success or failure, of 116 cows from 3 dairy herds treated or not with acoustic pulse therapy (APT).

P[F] treatment vs. control.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Distribution of somatic cell count.

Distribution of individual logSCC of 116 cows from 3 commercial herds identified with subclinical mastitis, before treatment and up to 3 months after it, according to Acoustic pulse therapy (APT) treatment (■; n = 78) and control (□; n = 38).

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Bacteria cure of 116 cows from 3 dairy herds treated or not with acoustic pulse therapy (APT).

P[F] treatment vs. control.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Bacteria cure and cow somatic cell count (SCC) of 29 cows treated with antibiotic (16) or with acoustic pulse therapy (APT) (13).

More »

Table 4 Expand