Fig 1.
Waking behavior observation protocol.
Timeline describing observation protocol. Procedures listed on top, with behaviors listed below. K/X: ketamine/xylazine, LORR: loss of righting reflex, RORR: return of righting reflex.
Fig 2.
Reversal agents exert specific influence on the time to achieve different behavioral markers characteristic of emergence and recovery from ketamine / xylazine anesthesia in mice.
The timing of waking behaviors and the duration of the emergence and recovery processes vary after animals were administered saline (SAL), yohimbine (YOH), or atipamezole (ATI) 15 minutes after anesthesia induction. Early emergence: Both YOH and ATI reduce the time required to exhibit the first behavioral signs of emergence from ketamine/xylazine anesthesia. Time for first incidence of individual waking behaviors is plotted, including whisker movement, respiratory change, and forelimb movement. Return of righting reflex (RORR) and Emergence Period: Both α2 antagonist treated groups ATI and YOH recover righting reflex faster, but YOH has increased delay between early markers (first marker to RORR) and RORR. Later Recovery and Recovery Period: Appearance of motoric behaviors during recovery show ATI elicits these behaviors faster than both YOH and SAL. There was no significant difference in the duration from RORR to Sticky Dot notice between the groups. Time measurements are from ketamine/xylazine injection. The gray lines between boxes indicate a statistically significant difference between the groups.
Table 1.
Durations from ketamine/xylazine injection until the behavioral marker as well as between defined markers.
Fig 3.
Latency to return of righting reflex (RORR) and sticky dot notice and the emergence and recovery period duration for the atipamezole (ATI) and ATI+PRA (prazosin) group.
A) There were no significant differences between the ATI and ATI+PRA group in the latency to RORR and sticky dot notice. There was no difference in the duration of the emergence period as well. The recovery period was significantly shorter for ATI than for ATI+PRA. The solid, gray lines indicate significant differences between groups. B) Time course of the durations to the different emergence and recovery markers. The solid lines present the mean and the 95% confidence interval on the mean. The gray line indicates time of reversal injection, 15 minutes post-ketamine/xylazine injection.
Table 2.
Durations from ketamine/xylazine injection until the behavioral marker as well as between defined markers.
Fig 4.
Timing of waking behavior incidence varies with reversing agent, while order is generally maintained.
A) Animals that did not receive alpha receptor agonists or antagonists (ketamine+isoflurane+saline) notice the sticky dot earlier than animals from the saline (SAL) and yohimbine (YOH) group The Kruskal-Wallis test indicated a significant difference among groups (p = 0.0052, χ2: 14.79). The significant differences between the groups exclusive K/I-SAL (K/I: ketamine/isoflurane) are reported in the results section. Time to sticky dot notice for K/I-SAL was significantly shorter when compared to SAL, YOH. There was no significant difference when compared to the atipamezole (ATI) group The solid, gray lines indicate significant differences between groups. B) All measured waking behavior hallmarks compared between the groups. The gray line indicates time of reversal injection, 15 minutes post-ketamine/xylazine injection. The solid lines present the mean and the 95% confidence interval on the mean.