Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Scores attributed to the formation and quality of bone tissue.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Expressed quantities of minerals in EBS detected by ICP-OES (g/kg).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Expressed quantities of mineral contaminants in EBS detected by ICP-OES (g/kg).

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Surface characterization using SEM analysis of EBS at X2.500 (A) and X5.000 (C); and Bio-Oss® at X2.500 (B) and X5.000 (D).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 4.

Distribution of the animals according to the scores attributed to formation and quality of bone tissue.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Neoformed bone expressed as percentage of total defect area (mean ± SD).

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 2.

Histological findings of bone defect after 21 days.

A and B represent the -C group with the presence of osteocytes (black arrow), osteoblasts (white arrow) and neoformed bone trabeculation (NB). C and D represent the +C group showing mesenchymal tissue (MT) and discret neoformed bone trabeculation (NB). E and F represent the EBS group where the predominance of MT and multifocal points of NB occupy the bone defect, presence of osteocytes and osteoblasts. B indicates Bio-Oss®; EBS indicates experimental bone substitute; * indicates the border of the bone defect. Tissues were stained with H&E and examined at 5x and 20x magnification (200 μm and 50 μm, repectively).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Bone formation score median between groups at different periods.

Different symbols (*,**) indicate statistically significant differences between groups at the same period.

More »

Fig 3 Expand