Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Summary of DNA markers used in this study.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Male fertility of F1 plants in two test crosses of TA-33BB-CMS x ‘Fukkoku-ouba’.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 1.

Marker analysis of s17 in F1 plants and a ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ DNA gel blot probed with the orf20-3' UTR.

(A) Agarose gel electrophoresis of s17 cleaved amplified fragments derived from representative F1 plants of the cross TA-33BB-CMS x ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ #2 and a TA-33BB-CMS plant. Male fertility of each plant is indicated as S, completely sterile, or N, normal. Size markers are shown on the left (kbp). (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis of s17 markers derived from TA-33BB-CMS and ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ plants. Size markers are shown on the left (kbp). (C) A DNA gel blot containing two genomic DNAs of ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ plants probed with the orf20-3' UTR. Size markers are shown on the left (kbp).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Marker analysis of o7 in F1 plants.

Agarose gel electrophoresis of o7 amplified fragments derived from representative F1 plants of the cross TA-33BB-CMS x ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ #2 and TA-33BB-CMS x ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ #1, and a TA-33BB-CMS plant. Male fertility of each plant is indicated as S, completely sterile, or N, normal. Size markers are shown on the left (kbp).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Segregation of o7 marker types and male fertility in TA-33BB-CMS x ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ #2.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Segregation of male fertility and the o7- and s17-marker-types in the B1 and B2 populations.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Segregation of o7 marker types in an F2 population.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Segregation of s17 marker types in an F2 population.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Table 7.

Marker types and male fertility in F2 population.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Fig 3.

Comparison of the genomic organization between ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ rf1 and NK-198 Rf1.

‘Fukkoku-ouba’ has a single copy of an orf20-like gene whereas homologs are clustered in NK-198. Boxes indicate genes (introns are not shown). Brackets denote the most similar regions. A single nucleotide substitution in exon 2 of orf20fukkoku is shown by a lollipop. The scale bar is shown below. The NK-198 Rf1 sequences correspond to DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession numbers AB646135 and AB646133.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Immunoblot analysis of transgenic suspension cells expressing FLAG-fused orf20fukkoku.

(A) Total cellular proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and probed with αFLAG or αCOXI. Lanes 1 to 6 are transgenic cell lines expressing FLAG-fused orf20fukkoku. Lane M and lane N are the size marker (that does not react with αFLAG or αCOXI) and non-transgenic cells, respectively. Molecular masses are shown on the right. (B) Mitochondria were electrophoresed by BN-PAGE and probed with αpreSATP6. Lanes 1–3, lanes 4–5, and lane 7 are transgenic cell lines expressing FLAG-fused orf20fukkoku, FLAG-fused orf20NK-198, and FLAG-fused orf20L, respectively. Lane N is the non-transgenic cells control. Size markers are shown on the left. An arrow indicates the position of the 200-kDa signal band.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Protein complexes containing preSATP6 in anthers.

(A) Anthers of a plant heterozygous for ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ rf1 (lane 1), TA-33BB-CMS (lane 2), and NK-198 (lane 3) were subjected to BN-PAGE, and the protein complexes were blotted onto membranes and probed with αpreSATP6. Size markers are shown on the left. Exposure time was 1 min. (B) The same blot as panel A but exposed for 2 hr. (C) The same blot as panel A but probed with αCOXI. (D) Anthers of a plant heterozygous for ‘Fukkoku-ouba’ rf1 (lane 1), TA-33BB-CMS (lane 2), and NK-198 (lane 3) were subjected to SDS-PAGE and αpreSATP6 was used for immunodetection.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 8.

Summary of qRT-PCR (mean ± SD) (n = 3).

More »

Table 8 Expand