Fig 1.
Flow diagram of search results according to the PRISMA statement.
From: Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred Reporting Iterns for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 6(7): e1000097. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097. For more information, visit www.prisma-statement.org.
Table 1.
Numbers of studies with low, medium, and high educational impact on Kirkpatrick level 1, separately for Mini-CEX and DOPS.
Fig 2.
Random-effects meta-analyses on the effects of Mini-CEX or DOPS compared with no intervention on trainee performance.
Positive numbers favor Mini-CEX/DOPS. Abbreviation used: SMD (standardized mean difference).
Table 2.
Cross table visualizing the association between quality and educational impact.
Table 3.
Cross table visualizing the association between participant responsiveness and educational impact.