Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Dataset details.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

A warping between two time series.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 2.

Dataset details.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Comparison of the Single-Pass fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of F-Measure and Entropy.

The bold values highlight the best results obtained in each case.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Comparison of the Online fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of F-Measure and Entropy.

The bold values highlight the best results obtained in each case.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 2.

Random example time series from 4 classes of the TR dataset.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Random example time series from 6 classes of the SY dataset.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Medoids of the TR dataset using (a) spFCM, (b) spFCMdd, (c) spFDTW, (d) oFCM, (e) oFCMdd, (f) oFDTW and (g) FCMddDTW.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Medoids of the SY dataset using (a) spFCM, (b) spFCMdd, (c) spFDTW, (d) oFCM, (e) oFCMdd, (f) oFDTW and (g) FCMddDTW.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Comparison of the Single-Pass fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of p-value on two datasets, (a) TR and (b) SY.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Comparison of the Single-Pass fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of -Log10(CS).

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Comparison of the Online fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of p-value on two datasets, (a) TR and (b) SY.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Comparison of the Online fuzzy clustering algorithms in terms of -Log10(CS).

More »

Fig 9 Expand