Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Diagnosis of B. burgdorferi infection by C6 Lyme ELISA.

Histogram showing the Lyme Index distribution produced by C6 Lyme ELISA conducted on all 192 patient samples. An index ≤ 0.90 is a negative Lyme diagnosis (118 samples), an index of 0.91–1.09 is an equivocal result (7 samples), and an index ≥ 1.10 is a positive Lyme diagnosis (67 samples).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Diagnosis of Lyme disease by qPCR and two-tier serology.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Diagnosis o Lyme disease by qPCR and serological tests.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Venn diagram summarizing the agreement in positive diagnoses of Lyme disease using different diagnostic methods.

B. burgdorferi infection can be detected by qPCR at a higher rate than C6 Lyme ELISA and 2-tier serological tests. There is significant overlap among all three tests.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Detection of single and co-infections of B. burgdorferi and B. microti using qPCR.

More »

Table 3 Expand