Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Flow-chart depicting the basic structure of the used pair-based HIV model.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

(A) Conceptual diagram illutrating the population in reproductive age by partnership status: not engaged in a stable couple (singles), sero-concordant HIV-negative stable couple, HIV sero-discordant stable couple, and sero-concordant HIV-positive stable couple. (B) Characterization of the four generic phases of the HIV epidemics in sub-Saharan Africa. The sero-discordancy patterns in each country were described and analyzed within the context of these phases of each country’s epidemic.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Population-level demographic and epidemiological indicators relating to HIV sero-discordancy by epidemic phase for six countries in sub-Saharan Africa representing different HIV epidemic scales: Low HIV prevalence (Niger and Mali), intermediate HIV prevalence (Tanzania and Kenya), and high HIV prevalence (Zimbabwe and Lesotho).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Model predicted proportion of HIV-infected individuals by partnership status: Not engaged in stable couple, sero-discordant stable couple, and sero-concordant positive stable couple.

Countries are shown in order of increasing HIV prevalence. (A) Niger, (B) Mali, (C) Tanzania, (D) Kenya, (E) Zimbabwe, and (F) Lesotho.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Model predicted proportion of stable HIV sero-discordant couples among all stable couples with at least one HIV-infected individual in the couple (Pdiscord) for six representative countries in sub-Saharan Africa.

Countries are shown in order of increasing HIV prevalence: (A) Niger, (B) Mali, (C) Tanzania, (D) Kenya, (E) Zimbabwe, and (F) Lesotho. The black lines show model predictions while the red asterisks show Demographic and Health Surveys data points and their 95% confidence interval [17].

More »

Fig 4 Expand