Table 1.
Patients’ characteristics, by AL subgroups.
Fig 1.
Correlation of AL between Argos and IOL Master biometers.
Significant positive correlations were observed between the biometers (r = 0.998, P < 0.001).AL = axial length.
Fig 2.
Bland–Altman plot of AL using Argos and IOL Master biometers.
The limits of agreement were set at ± 1.96 × standard deviation (SD). There was a significant negative correlation between the mean AL of the two biometers and the AL difference (r = -0.63, P < 0.001). AL = axial length.
Fig 3.
Bland–Altman plot of AL using Argos and IOL Master biometers in the short-AL group.
The limits of agreement were set at ± 1.96 × SD. The values with Argos were longer than those with IOL Master in 81.3% (13/16) of eyes in the short-AL group. AL = axial length.
Fig 4.
Bland–Altman plot of AL using Argos and IOL Master biometers in the intermediate-AL group.
The limits of agreement were set at ± 1.96 × SD. AL = axial length.
Fig 5.
Bland–Altman plot of AL using Argos and IOL Master biometers in the long-AL group.
The limits of agreement were set at ± 1.96 × SD. The values with Argos were shorter than those with IOL Master in 87.5% (14/16) of eyes in the long-AL group. AL = axial length.
Table 2.
Axial length differences, by biometer.
Table 3.
Mean value of each tissue in subgroups by Argos.
Table 4.
Numbers of eyes evaluated by the two biometers, by AL subgroup.