Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

The quantitative fit test was performed using the Porta-Count Plus.

(a) Cup-type respirator, which is preformed to a cup shape. (b) Fold-type respirator, which is flexible and free-folded. (c) Macintosh laryngoscope, which has a size 4 curved blade with a Satin Slip stylet. (d) GlideScope® with a GlideRite rigid stylet. (e) I-gel® airway device.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Diagram showing the flow of participants through the study.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics and clinical experience.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 3.

Fit factor values for the two types of N95 respirator when used for intubation using three types of airway device.

The fit factor value for the valve type was decreased during intubation. There were significant differences between the fit factor values for the cup-type respirator and the fold-type respirator when intubations were performed using the three different airway devices. ∘Outlier value more than 1.5 times the upper or lower limit.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 2.

Fit factor values for N95 respirators in the baseline and intubation scenarios (n = 26).

More »

Table 2 Expand