Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

A summary of the age, body mass index (BMI), weight, height and left and right mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) of the 31 study participants (11 female, 20 male).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Illustration of photo capture setup: Views 1 to 5 –relative orientations between the camera and the participant’s left and right arm.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Manually annotated markers of a photo from A) view 1, and B) view 3, of participant 0007. Black circles are the corners of the reference object; black solid line is the floor line; blue cross is the top of the head; red dashed line is the bounding box; green x’s are the two edges of the left mid-upper arm; and yellow x’s are the two edges of the right mid-upper arm. Note that the floor line and the bottom edge of the bounding box do not align.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Performance of height estimation from linear distance from head point to floor line, using camera calibration and reference object.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Performance of height estimation from linear regression of distance from head point to floor line for all combinations of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 views, using camera calibration and floor line.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Performance of height estimation from linear regression of bounding box height for all combinations of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 views, using camera calibration and reference object.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Performance of MUAC estimation from shape models using camera calibration and reference object.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Performance of MUAC estimation from linear regression of arm width for combinations of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 views using camera calibration and reference object.

More »

Table 6 Expand