Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Regulation effectiveness score (%) as a function of regulation strategy, social content, and emotional content in 14-year-old adolescents.

The error bars correspond to one standard error.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Mean affect rating (and SD) according to instruction condition (distraction, reappraisal, look), social content (social, nonsocial), and emotional content (moral violation, threat-related).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean affect rating (and SD) for 12-, 13- and 15-year-old adolescents according to instruction condition (distraction, reappraisal, look), emotional content (moral violation, threat-related) and social content (social, nonsocial).

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Regulation effectiveness as a function of regulation strategy and age.

The error bars correspond to one standard error.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 3.

Differences in reporting of regulation strategies between 12-year-old, 13-year-old and 15-year-old adolescents: means, standard deviations, and F-tests.

More »

Table 3 Expand