Fig 1.
Hypothetical model on the impact of personality, attitudes and empathy on blatant and subtle prejudice.
Table 1.
Mean, standard deviation and Pearson product-moment correlations between the variables in the model of blatant and subtle prejudice (N = 243).
Fig 2.
Path analysis of a dual-process model of blatant and subtle prejudice, including general empathy.
The standardized regression weights are represented on the arrows, and the squared multiple correlations on the endogenous variables. Dashed arrows indicate expected effects of empathy that did not reach statistical significance. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig 3.
Path analysis of a dual-process model of blatant and subtle prejudice, including perspective taking.
The standardized regression weights are represented on the arrows, and the squared multiple correlations on the endogenous variables. Dashed arrows indicate expected effects associated to empathy that did not reach statistical significance. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.
Fig 4.
Path analysis of a dual-process model of blatant and subtle prejudice, including empathic joy.
The standardized regression weights are represented on the arrows, and the squared multiple correlations on the endogenous variables. Dashed arrows indicate expected effects associated to empathy that did not reach statistical significance. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.