Fig 1.
Time-points of objective and subjective measurements (SB = sedentary behaviour, PDR = previous day recall, PWR = previous week recall).
Fig 2.
Reproduced from Fig 1 Dall PM, Coulter EH, Fitzsimons CF, Skelton DA, Chastin SFM, on behalf of the Seniors USP Team. The TAxonomy of Self-reported Sedentary behaviour Tools (TASST) framework for development, comparison and evaluation of self-report tools: content analysis and systematic review. BMJ Open 2017;7:e013844 [9].
Table 1.
Ranking of methods to measure sedentary behaviour based on responsiveness in different contexts, as classified in Beaton’s responsiveness taxonomy [11].
Fig 3.
Variation in objectively measured sedentary behaviour.
Left: Daily sedentary behaviour for a period of 14 days (N = 18). Right: Average daily sedentary behaviour in Week 1 and Week 2 (N = 18).
Table 2.
Relative reliability, absolute reliability, Minimal Detectable change and responsiveness of tools to measure sedentary behaviour (N = 18).
Fig 4.
Variation in subjectively measured total sedentary behaviour.
Left: Total daily sedentary behaviour measured with a previous day recall questionnaire on 7 days (N = 18). Right: Average total sedentary behaviour per day in Week 1 and Week 2 based on a previous week recall questionnaire (N = 18).