Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Patients’ recruitment flowchart.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Study design.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Apomorphine/placebo effect on cold pain threshold (seconds) in a non-painful site (hand) (n = 31).

Boxplot representing median, 25th and 75th percentiles for cold pain threshold (sec) in the hand for the two study conditions, measured before (baseline) and after drug administration. The asterisk represents a significant difference only between baseline and test 3 measurements following apomorphine administration. * <0.01.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Apomorphine/placebo effects on experimental cold pain in a non-painful site (hand).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 4.

Apomorphine/placebo effect on cold pain tolerance (seconds) in a non-painful site (hand) (n = 28).

Boxplot representing median, 25th and 75th percentiles for cold pain tolerance (sec) in the hand for the two study conditions, measured before (baseline) and after drug administration. The asterisk represents a significant difference only between baseline and test 3 measurements following apomorphine administration. * <0.01.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Apomorphine/placebo effect on cold pain tolerance in the painful leg (n = 19).

Boxplot representing median, 25th and 75th percentiles for cold pain tolerance (sec) in the affected leg for the two study conditions, measured before (baseline) and after drug administration. No significant differences between baseline and test 1–3 measurements were detected following apomorphine/placebo administration.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 2.

Apomorphine/placebo effects on spontaneous pain and on pain evoked by cold stimulation in the painful leg.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

The number of patients who experienced different side effects.

More »

Table 3 Expand