Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Search strategy.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Meta–analysis of RR intervals of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; RR: RR intervals; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Meta–analysis of SDNN of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; SDNN: Standard Deviation of RR intervals; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Meta–analysis of RMSSD of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; RMSSD: square root of mean squared differences of successive RR intervals; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Meta–analysis of pNN50 of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; pNN50: percentage of RR intervals with more than 50 ms variation; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Meta–analysis of total power of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; TP: Total Power; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Meta–analysis of the LF of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; LF: Low Frequency; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Meta–analysis of the HF of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; HF: High Frequency; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 8 Expand

Fig 9.

Meta–analysis of LF/HF of type 2 diabetes mellitus patients compared with controls.

-: non reported data (missing SD were also non reported). 95% CI: 95% confident intervals; BMI: Body Mass Index; LF/HF: Low Frequency/High Frequency ratio; T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; SD: Standard Deviation.

More »

Fig 9 Expand

Fig 10.

Meta–regression of factors influencing heart rate variability in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

95% CI: 95% confident intervals; RR: RR intervals; SDNN: Standard Deviation of RR intervals; pNN50: percentage of RR intervals with more than 50 ms variation; RMSSD: square root of mean squared differences of successive RR intervals; TP: Total Power; LF: Low Frequency; HF: High Frequency; LF/HF: Low Frequency/High Frequency ratio.

More »

Fig 10 Expand