Fig 1.
General diagrams of the blocks.
Table 1.
Patient demographics.
Fig 2.
Typical mfVEP analysis method.
Upper left: stimulus and recording process; lower left: 60-sector signal map for each of the six channels; lower right: 60-sector signal map for each of the six channels after 1–35Hz bandpass filtering; upper right: 60-sector signal map for the best channel of each sector and signal for one sector.
Fig 3.
Original signal and IMF1–IMF4 from the OD (black) and OS (red) from a control subject.
Fig 4.
EMD and residues obtained when all the signals in the control database are averaged.
Time (left) and frequency (right).
Fig 5.
Example of Best IMF selection (OD, sector 1).
Highest P2T values is presented in IMF1 so this one is selected as the Best IMF.
Fig 6.
Ring 5 signals are colored in green.
Fig 7.
Interocular latency computation flow.
Table 2.
Percentage of time as best IMF and maximum peak frequency.
Table 3.
P2T measured for each study group.
The values are shown as the mean ± SD.
Table 4.
AUC values for RIS, CIS and MS groups.
Table 5.
LINTER: Mean interocular latency values for control patients; NAS: Percentage of non-analyzable sectors; CVINTER: Intersubject coefficient of variability; CVINTRA: Intrasubject coefficient of variability; FF: Full field; R5: Ring 5.