Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Workflow of the whole integrated meta-analysis for integration of Affymetrix/Illumina expression data from PDAC datasets.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Characteristics of both Cohort 1 and Cohort 2 groups of PDAC patients.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Coincident genes in the three analyzes: Affymetrix, Illumina and integrated meta-analysis.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of individual analysis by technology with integrated analysis.

a Coincident genes in the three analyzes: Affymetrix, Illumina and integrated meta-analysis (Table 2). b Remaining differentially expressed genes in individual Illumina and the integrative meta-analysis (S1 Table). c Remaining differentially expressed genes in individual Affymetrix and the integrative meta-analysis (S2 Table). d Differentially expressed genes in the integrative meta-analysis but not in individual analysis (gained genes) (S3 Table).

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

ROC Curves for the 5 genes commonly expressed: FAMI3, IRAK3, DENND2D, PLBD1 and AGPAT9.

Curves are provided for both Illumina and Affymetrix individual analyses as well as our integrative meta-analysis. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) metrics are also provided for each curve.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 3.

Sensitivity and specificity values for the selected genes after a leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) process.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Shared Gene Ontology (GO) terms after the gene enrichment analysis applied over the 28 gained genes.

The Kolmogorov-Smirnov statistical test was performed to determine their significance (p-value < 0.05).

More »

Table 4 Expand