Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Visual stimuli.

The angry face (right) and the happy face (left) with faces from The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Schematic representation of the successive presentation of all stimuli.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Area of interest representing the whole face.

The angry face (right) and the happy face (left). Faces from The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Area of interest representing the eyes and the mouth.

The angry face (right) and the happy face (left). Faces from The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces—KDEF.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 1.

Results in the baseline condition of the visual test phase analyses.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Results of the visual test phase analyses.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 5.

Looking time at happy or angry faces.

Infants’ mean looking time (s) in function of voices (angry or happy) and emotional faces (angry: blue or happy: green). After hearing a happy voice, infants look longer at the angry face than the happy face (F(1, 23) = 4.85, p < .05). The vertical bars represent positive standard errors (s.e.m.),*p < .05.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Looking times at happy or angry AOIs (mouth or eyes).

Infants’ mean looking time (s) in function of the emotional voices (happy or angry) and emotional AOIs (happy: green or angry: blue). The angry mouth is looked at longer than the happy mouth F(1, 23) = 12.39, p < .01. After the happy voice, the angry mouth is looked at longer than the happy mouth (F(1, 23) = 8.32, p < .01). The vertical bars represent positive standard errors (s.e.m.), **p < .01.

More »

Fig 6 Expand