Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Astigmatism before and after cycloplegia.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Demographic characteristics between the validation study and the main study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Percentage of TA, CA, and ORA by different criteria and gender.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Percentage of different types of axes of astigmatism greater than or equally 1.00D.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

The axis relationship between ocular residual and corneal astigmatism.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Fig 1.

Proportion of the three types of axis relationships between CA and ORA in different levels of TA.

On-axis: axis difference between the ORA and CA of 0 ± 10°, opposite-axis: axis difference of 90 ± 10°, with the remaining considered as oblique-axis.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 6.

Compensation factor for the relationship between ocular residual and corneal astigmatism.

More »

Table 6 Expand

Fig 2.

Correlation between CA and ORA in (A) J0 and (B) J45. There was a statistically significant correlation between these two sources of astigmatism for both vectors. J0 = Jackson cross-cylinder power at axis 0° and 90°; J45 = Jackson cross-cylinder power at axis 45° and 135°.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 7.

Comparison of demographic factors in respect to the relative level of ORA and CA.

More »

Table 7 Expand

Table 8.

Comparison of demographic factors in respect to the axis relationship between CA and ORA.

More »

Table 8 Expand