Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Appearance of various forms of HPS.

(A) liquid form. (B) lyophilized powder form. (C) redissolved lyophilized powder form in plastic tube. (D) redissolved lyophilized powder form in plastic well of a 12-well plate (volume of 1ml). Redissolved lyophilized powder form HPS showed clear, faint yellow color with satisfactory transparency.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Comparison of liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms of HPS and HPLs.

Control column on the left shows the NTUH (National Taiwan University Hospital) logo, plastic well, and plastic well containing PBS. HPS and HPLs (UltraGRO and PLTMax) shown on the right appear as clear yellow solutions with similar levels of transparency between the the liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Quantification of epitheliotrophic factors in liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms of HPLs with the ELISA assay.

Concentrations of (A) EGF, (B) PDGF-AB, (C) PDGF-BB and (D) TGF-β1 were measured in UltraGRO and PLTMax. There were no statistically significant differences in the concentration levels between liquid and redissolved powder forms (p>0.05). Error bars indicate SD.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Scratch-induced directional wounding assay at 16 hours.

(A) HCECs were cultured in 5% blood derivatives (FBS, HPS, UltraGRO and PLTMax) in liquid or redissolved lyophilized powder forms, and tested for wound-healing after scratching. All blood derivatives had increased wound-healing ratios compared to the control (serum-free) at 16 hours (p<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences in wound healing ratios between liquid and redissolved powder forms (p>0.05). **p<0.01 compared to the control. Error bars indicate SD. (B) Representative images from inverted microscopy that was done to evaluate wound healing in HCECs cells cultured in 5% blood derivatives (FBS, HPS, UltraGRO and PLTMax) in liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms. Control represents the original scraping area at 0 hours after injury.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

MTS assay to evaluate cell proliferation.

HCEC were cultured in blood derivatives (FBS, HPS, UltraGRO and PLTMax) at 3%, 5% and 10% concentrations and tested with the MTS assay at 24, 48, and 72 hours. Compared to the control (no serum), cell incubated in blood derivatives resulted in increased proliferation at 48 and 72 hours. Liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms produced similar results at almost all concentrations and time points (p>0.05). *p<0.05 compared to the control.**p<0.01 compared to the control. Error bars indicate SD.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

TEER assay to evaluate cell differentiation and function.

HCEC were cultured in 5% blood derivatives (liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms of FBS, HPS, UltraGRO and PLTMax) and measured for TEER values on day 3. Compared to the control (no serum), cell incubated in blood derivatives produced increased TEER values. Liquid and redissolved lyophilized powder forms gave similar results (p>0.05). **p<0.01 compared to the control. Error bars indicate SD.

More »

Fig 6 Expand

Fig 7.

Corneal epithelial wound healing in rats.

Rats underwent corneal epithelial debridement and topical applicaton of liquid or redissolved powder forms of blood derivatives. Corneal epithelial defects were stained with fluorescein and photographed at 0, 12, 24 and 48 hours to determine wound healing ratios. Compared to the control (no topical treatment), rats treated with blood derivatives had greater wound healing ratios at 24 hours. Effects were similar for liquid and redissolved powder forms. All rats had fully healed corneal epithelium at 48 hours. *p<0.05 compared to the control. **p<0.01 compared to the control. Error bars indicate SD.

More »

Fig 7 Expand

Fig 8.

Cell morphologies during corneal epithelial wound healing in rats.

Images were taken at 48 hours with a HR3 confocal microscope to view corneal epithelium for rats that underwent no corneal epithelial debridement (normal cornea), rats that underwent debridement but no treatment (control group), and rats that underwent debridement and treatment with UltraGRO (liquid form and powder form). Corneal epithelial debridement treated with UltraGRO had healed apical and basal epithelia similar to those of normal cornea, while the control had dry apical squamous cells and WBC infiltrates in the basal epithelium. The superficial stroma was not damaged, and appeared similar across the different groups. Image dimensions of 0.4mm x 0.4mm.

More »

Fig 8 Expand