Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Comparison for the outline of JIS Z 2801:2000 / ISO 22196 [5] and the protocols used in the different studies.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

General information on test conditions according to ISO 22196:2011/ JIS Z 2801:2012 and deviations from the standard protocol.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Description of alternative test methods used in the study.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Table 4.

Summary of the results for antibacterial testing of the compounds in different laboratories.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Fig 1.

Testing of the effect of compound 1 and 3 on E. coli subject to incubation time (a) and calculation of the resulting R values according to ISO 22196 / JIS Z 2801 (b). Data is given as mean ± standard deviation. Note that the R values were calculated to the growth controls at the respective time points to avoid bias.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Determination of the antibacterial effect of compound 1 and 3 on E. coli after twenty-four hours as a function of the inoculum density by measurement of the bacterial count (a) and calculation of the resulting R values according to ISO 22196 / JIS Z 2801 (b). Data is given as mean ± standard deviation.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Assessment of the physiological state of the microorganisms on the outcome of antibacterial testing of compound 1 and 3.

Therefore, E. coli in the stationary phase and the exponential growth phase were compared as well as E. coli grown in shaking cultures over night or colonies used directly from agar plates. E. coli was monitored over twenty-four hours (a) and resulting R values were calculated after twenty-four hours according to ISO 22196 / JIS Z 2801 (b). Data is given as mean ± standard deviation.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Evaluation of the influence of compound 1 and 3 on E. coli after twenty-four hours as a function of nutrient supply.

Experiments were performed in nutrient broth diluted 1:500, 1:50, and 1:5 compared to undiluted and resulting amounts of E. coli were measured (a) and R values calculated according to ISO 22196 (b). Data is given as mean ± standard deviation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

AFM measurements of the PA6 control (a), compound 1 (b) and compound 3 (c). Surface roughness is depicted in a range from 0 to 400 nm. The scale bar determines a length of 2 μm.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Table 5.

Summary of material surface characterization for the compounds.

More »

Table 5 Expand