Fig 1.
The influence of organisational and policymaker capacity on policymakers’ engagement with, and use of research in health policymaking.
Based on the SPIRIT Action Framework as described in: Redman, S., Turner, T., Davies, H., Williamson, A., Haynes, A., Brennan, S.,… Green, S. (2015). The SPIRIT Action Framework: A structured approach to selecting and testing strategies to increase the use of research in policy. Soc Sci Med, 136–137, 147–155. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.05.009.
Table 1.
Purpose, components, constructs, and domains assessed by each of the key outcome measured used in the present study.
Table 2.
Systems and tools to support research use within each agency in the six month period prior to measurement.
Fig 2.
Agencies’ ORACLe scores for each capacity domain and total capacity scores.
Fig 3.
Research engagement actions scores.
Agencies’ SAGE scores for individual research engagement actions and the average score for research engagement actions.
Fig 4.
Agencies’ SAGE scores for each research use action and the average score for research use.