Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

General features of the strains used as reference genomes for the cgSNV analysis of 145 S. Heidelberg isolates.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Epidemiologic and subtyping results of the 145 S. Heidelberg clinical and food isolates used in this study.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Assembly statistics for the 5 S. Heidelberg isolates that served as reference genomes.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 1.

Minimum spanning phylogenetic tree of the core genome of 145 S. Heidelberg sequenced isolates generated using A) draft genome or B) closed referenced genome (ID117795) as an example.

Isolates in the same circle have 0 hqSNVs and the size of each circle is proportional to the number of isolates in the circle.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Minimum spanning phylogenetic tree of the core genome of 145 S. Heidelberg sequenced isolates generated using the distantly related reference S. Derby (SL477).

Isolates in the same circle have 0 hqSNVs and the size of each circle is proportional to the number of isolates in the circle.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 4.

Phylogenetic observations of the minimum spanning tree topology built from cgSNV analysis of 145 S. Heidelberg isolates and comparison of draft and closed genomes as references.

More »

Table 4 Expand

Table 5.

Comparison of the number of high quality SNVs between 145 S. Heidelberg sporadic and outbreak isolates using a draft, closed and distantly related reference genomes.

More »

Table 5 Expand

Table 6.

Robinson-Foulds topological distances between trees generated with 145 S. Heidelberg sequenced isolates using draft and closed genomes as references during cgSNV analysis.

More »

Table 6 Expand