Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Histograms of attribution to ability.

n = 120. By condition: n = 31, n = 31, n = 26 (Difficult-English), and n = 32 (Difficult-Dutch).

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Table 1.

Mean and standard deviation of ability attributions by difficulty and language.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Histograms of attribution to ability minus total other.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 2.

Mean and standard deviation of attribution to ability minus the average of the luck, task difficulty, and effort attributions, by difficulty and language.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Table 3.

Mean and standard deviation of attribution to ability minus total luck, task difficulty, and effort attributions, by difficulty and language.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 3.

OLS analysis on attribution to ability minus total other attributions.

Fig 3 is based on a model regressing attribution to ability on score achieved, language condition, the interaction between them, and a continuous measure of FLA and its interaction with score and language condition separately and combined, and control variables for gender, current average English grade, and whether the participant was in the 2nd or 3rd year.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Expected conceptual model.

The interaction term captures the positive covariation, such that the main effects capture only negative covariation.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Post hoc conceptual model.

The interaction term is counteracted, such that the language main effect captures both positive and negative covariation, and that negative covariation is weaker.

More »

Fig 5 Expand