Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Experimental layout and water treatment replications.

Each one of the four horizontal blocks comprised the three different water regimes applied. T0: full irrigation treatment. T1: moderate irrigation treatment. T2: no irrigation treatment.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Detail from a treatment replication and thermal system (A) and picture of the actual on-the-go system (B).

The thermal camera was connected to an industrial computer and controlled by the driver.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Canopy thermal image taken on-the-go at 5 km/h.

The middle section between the green bars was defined as the area of interest. Total image resolution was 320 × 256 pixels, while the area of interest had a size of 320 × 135 pixels. The temperature values are expressed in degrees Celsius.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Table 1.

Mean values according to measurement days for vapor pressure deficit (VPD), incoming solar irradiance, canopy temperatures (by canopy side and irrigation treatment) and stem water potential (Ψstem) determined at solar noon, between 14:00 and 15:00.

N = 12 per irrigation treatment for the statistical tests of canopy temperatures and Ψstem (MPa).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Performance statistics for the stem water potential (Ψstem) prediction models using Tdry and Twet reference temperatures.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 4.

Regression plots for the water status prediction models with Tdry and Twet reference temperatures.

Plots from east (A, B) and west (C, D) sides of the canopy and from the global model trained with data from both sides (E, F); and for cross validation (A, C, E) and prediction (B, D, F). The dashed lines are the prediction confidence bands at 95%. The dotted lines represent the 1:1 line with slope 1.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Table 3.

Performance statistics for the stem water potential (Ψstem) prediction models without the use of Tdry and Twet reference temperatures.

More »

Table 3 Expand

Fig 5.

Regression plots for the water status prediction models without thermal indices.

Plots from east (A, B) and west (C, D) sides of the canopy and from the global model trained with data from both sides (E, F); and for cross validation (A, C, E) and prediction (B, D, F). The dashed lines are the prediction confidence bands at 95%. The dotted lines represent the 1:1 line with slope 1.

More »

Fig 5 Expand