Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Comparison of different eukaryotic components extracted in 13 samples from HIV-infected patients using 4 methods of DNA extraction.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

The distribution of the major eukaryotic MOTUs detected in the fecal samples of HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects using cloning and sequencing methods.

The heatmap shows read counts for the 33 MOTUs identified as contributing most to the variance (up to 86% across all samples) as determined by Similarity Percentage (SIMPER) analysis. The dendrogram shows the clustering of samples based on Bray-Curtis similarity distance.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Abundance and distribution of the fungal OTUs obtained from the amplification of the ITS1 region in the fecal samples of HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Abundance and distribution of the fungal OTUs obtained from the amplification of the ITS2 region in fecal samples of HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

The distribution of the major fungal OTUs obtained from the amplification of the ITS1 region in the fecal samples of HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects.

The heatmap shows read counts for the 15 OTUs identified as contributing most to the variance (up to 86% across all samples) as determined by SIMPER analysis. The dendrogram shows the clustering of samples based on Bray-Curtis similarity distance.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

The distribution of the major fungal OTUs recovered from the amplification of the ITS2 region in the fecal samples of HIV-infected patients and healthy subjects.

The heatmap shows read counts for the 13 OTUs identified as contributing most to the variance (up to 86% across all samples) as determined by SIMPER analysis. The dendrogram shows the clustering of samples based on Bray-Curtis similarity distance.

More »

Fig 6 Expand