Table 1.
Eligibility criteria.
Table 2.
Definition of measurement properties based on COSMIN [20] and Terwee et al.[21].
Table 3.
Quality criteria for results on measurement properties based on Terwee et al.[21].
Table 4.
Levels of evidence for the best-evidence synthesis.
Fig 1.
Flow diagram of article selection process.
Fig 2.
Number of included articles and instrument.
Table 5.
Characteristics of the instruments measuring the process of SDM regarding the construct and the instruments’ measurement features.
Table 6.
Best level of evidence for each measurement property per instrument measuring the process of SDM (N = 38).
Table 7.
Overall results on best-evidence synthesis per measurement property of instruments measuring the process of SDM (N = 43).
Table 8.
Overall results on methodological quality of the studies that evaluated measurement properties of instruments measuring the process of SDM, as based on COSMIN checklist scoring.