Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Table 1.

Influences on detection probability model selection.

More »

Table 1 Expand

Fig 1.

Seasonal detection probability.

Variation in detection probability (p) between water samples (Blue) and sediment samples (Red) across the seasons, in the different study areas (LW—Little Wittenham; SLH—Stanford-le-Hope; WIC—Wickford), with 95% confidence intervals. These results are based on a clay substrate and an HSI of 0.65 (a score considered mid-range for great crested newt occupancy). Comparisons with ponds in other HSI categories are shown in S1 Fig.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Habitat suitability and detection probability.

Variation in detection probability (p) between water samples (solid line) and sediment samples (dotted line) in relation to HSI score at three study areas. 95% confidence intervals in light colours. These results are based on a clay substrate and samples collected in spring. Comparisons across the seasons are shown in S2 Fig.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Sediment yype and detection probability.

Variation in detection probability (p) between water samples (Blue) and sediment samples (Red) with various sediment types, and study area (LW—Little Wittenham; SLH—Stanford-le-Hope; WIC—Wickford), with 95% confidence intervals. These are based on sample collection in spring and an HSI of 0.65 (a score considered mid-range for great crested newt occupancy). Comparisons with ponds in other seasons are shown in S3 Fig.

More »

Fig 3 Expand