Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

< Back to Article

Fig 1.

Inhaler recording setup.

More »

Fig 1 Expand

Fig 2.

Example of inhaler inhalation audio and flow signals.

(A) inhaler inhalation audio signal with estimated acoustic envelope and (B) corresponding flow signal.

More »

Fig 2 Expand

Table 1.

Participant information and baseline lung function (mean ± standard deviation).

More »

Table 1 Expand

Table 2.

Mean (± standard deviation) of flow parameter values from recorded inhalation flow signals averaged across all participants.

More »

Table 2 Expand

Fig 3.

Examples of actual and estimated inhaler inhalation flow profiles.

(A) High, (B) Medium and (C) Low flow rates. The vertical lines represent the actual and estimated Tr values.

More »

Fig 3 Expand

Fig 4.

Average audio-based flow estimation errors.

(A) Averageerror, (B) PIFRerror, (C) ICerror and (D) Trerror (%) (± standard error). Results are divided into models calibrated using high, medium and low flow inhalation recordings and tested on high, medium and low flow ranges.

More »

Fig 4 Expand

Fig 5.

Boxplots representing the median, interquartile range and 1.5×interquartile range of regression coefficients.

(A) a and (B) b regression coefficients where *p<0.05 and **p<0.01 corrected for multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction.

More »

Fig 5 Expand

Fig 6.

Average accuracy (%) of inhalation flow profile parameter estimation across all flow rates at different SNR levels.

More »

Fig 6 Expand